Can a Martial Arts Theocracy Strengthen Liberalism

Can a Martial Arts

Theocracy Strengthen Liberalism

Are Liberals Too Tolerant of Islam? Ben Affleck, Bill Maher,
Sam Harris, Nicholas Kristoff Debate
LECTURE ARTICLE FOR APRIL 23, 2015

BY GOSEI YAMAGUCHI

Synopsis

April 24, 2014

The karate instructors, in Okinawa, refer to the purpose of learning the art of karate through the phrase, “hitoni utarezu, hitoutazu, kotonaki, kotowo, mototosuru.”

Translated, this means “…thus no one can harm you nor can you harm anyone,” and as such both parties survive without hurting or eliminating others.

Another phrase they would introduce to you is, ”karate ni sente nashi” which means “karate practitioners do not make the first move.” The practitioner never initiates a confrontation; the first action taken by you is to defend yourself from an individual who intends to harm you physically. This concept is reflected in all kata in that kata always begin with a block. However, you counter this first attempt of defense by an offensive move with all katas concluding with a defensive move.

Many have understood the principle behind karate as a discipline of self defense. And yet, this interpretation has been mistakenly used to justify an act that could be used against the offender that would punish them, and if necessary, fatally harm them. In some Christian societies, there is a sentiment to justify an act of violence if that violence was a result of defending one’s self or family.

On the other hand, ethnic cultures who are a minority within the community or a host nation, develop a wisdom in order to survive – they have learned that it is not advantageous to harm a member of the authority class or a member of the majority. Within a ghetto or minority commune, the legal and civil rights of the minority may be poorly protected by the host state or authority, therefore, their acts of self-defense will not be protected.

Ryukyu or Okinawa once was a colony of the Satsuma clan of Japan and consequently became a prefecture of Japan during the 19th century. While the islanders are now Japanese citizens, they have maintained their traditional social ethics as reflected by their cultural heritage.

Between 1930 – 1940, university students from mainland Japan were attracted to the exotic Okinawa-originated martial arts, 唐手. They referred to this art as “karate” which means “Chinese hand.”

This group modified the Okinawan art to include free-sparring forms despite the fact that free sparring was strongly discouraged in Okinawa by Okinawans. At the end of the Pacific War, during the U.S. occupation of Japan, General Douglas MacArthur purged Budokukai, the Japanese legislature of martial arts. He and his staff were threatened by the very institution which promoted military aggression of the Japanese empire.

Consequently, most of the martial arts as well as karate, were reformed into a competitive sport in order to survive during the U.S. occupation of Japan.

It is my view that the tournament aspect of karate represents only a part of the art. I have reminded the karate society in Japan to reevaluate the origin of the art as it evolved in Okinawa. I suggested to my fellow instructors in Japan that their teaching method and practices be more closely informed by teachings from the era of Okinawa, bringing about a renaissance of karate. The athletic events of contests originated in ancient Greece. The Olympic events started as far back as 6th century BC. The contest aspect of events in Hellenism also contributed to the spectacles for public entertainment. Romans adapted these ideas into the contests among gladiators of which we are familiar today.

To make martial arts more palatable to the authorities of the West, the practices were converted into sports events as a political gesture to acquiesce to the war victors. This enabled the arts to continue and the associated heritage maintained.

Since the reformation era beginning in 1864, the Japanese swiftly converted their political and social structure into a nation state adopted from the European political structure. According to 19th century historians, ancient Greek political philosophy influenced Western culture. The concept of nationalism derived from the Greek political philosophy, “big nation with big roots.”  To convert the art of karate into the western concept of sport was successful from a political point of view. However, in the process,

most Japanese karate instructors lost the thread in that they had lost the origin of the art.

The terms “post-colonialism,” “nationalism,” “globalism,” and “multicultural nation” have been offered by scholars of the social sciences as concepts for intellectual discourse.

In this lecture I will explain to you the metaphysical ideals taught by the karate founders in Okinawa and how these ideals fit into the modern multi-cultural nation (such as the U.S.) as well as global society of our time.

July 31, 2014

Synopsis

July 31, 2014

The narrative of the Tower of Babel (Genesis 11.1-9) describes how the variety of different languages confused people, and therefore, instead of remaining in one centralized community, the people scattered throughout the face of the earth.

That event has come to symbolize a condition which has not changed since those biblical times. Our current international political society is composed of nations where populations speak different mother tongues and are of different genetic make-up. This has led to suffering among many particularly among the immigrant minority within the hosting nation.

For example, the United States’ constitution and its various laws and regulations serve to protect the basic human rights of the individual, including minority citizens. The United States could represent a microcosm of a multicultural society, and extendable to the world at large.

The Okinawan concept of the art of karate is effective as an educational tool to establish a common sense of global citizenship. Every citizen needs to develop a mentality whereby coexisting with different groups of people is a critical component of its values and ideologies. To pass these values on to our children so that they are ready for that society which then enables the society to flourish, we need an educational model to build the mentality.

The Okinawan mentality, “hitoni utarezu, hitoutazu, kotonaki, kotowo, mototosuru.” would be effective to shape such a society.

The traditional hierarchical society, has groups of minorities who suffer and are victimized by the hosting majority people and the authority the majority possess. Some of those victimized have experienced many generations of anger, regret and envy. As quoted by scholars of sociology, there is a significant sociological and psychological tendency for a member of the minority community to feel some degree of hostility toward the majority. The French term, “ressentiment”, is thus applied.

The late August Wilson, an African American playwright wrote the Pulitzer Prize winning play, “Fences.” Here he presents a significant example of the black American society and its resentment toward the majority.

We all could be a minority in one way or another due to our mother tongue, gender, racial and physical appearance, financial status, political beliefs, educational and career status, and even religious beliefs.

In this lecture, I would like to point out how to understand an exploited group of people by studying “ressentiment” and how the Okinawan concept can ameliorate our understanding of the multicultural world.